US Forces Seize Three Iranian Oil Tankers
Darwin, 23 April: One day after extending the ceasefire with Iran indefinitely, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) has seized three Iranian-flagged oil tankers. According to international…
WASHINGTON, D.C. : As President Donald Trump prepares for a critical Tuesday briefing from senior military officials, the question in Washington is no longer if the U.S. can strike Iran, but how and why.
Following the successful capture of Nicolas Maduro in Venezuela—an operation Trump recently hailed as one of the most successful in American history—the appetite for military action in the Oval Office is reportedly high. However, as senior fellows at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) warn, “Iran is not Venezuela.”
The U.S. has already proven its ability to strike from a distance. Last summer, B-2 stealth bombers conducted 30-hour round-trip missions from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri to deploy bunker-busting munitions against Iran’s most fortified nuclear facilities.
Pentagon sources suggest a “lengthy target list” is currently being finalized, which could include:
Targeting IRGC command structures and units responsible for the domestic crackdown.
Disrupting Iran’s internal communication and command-and-control networks to sow confusion among security forces.
Covertly emboldening the “Axis of Resistance” internal dissidents to weaken the regime’s resolve.
Despite the “locked and loaded” rhetoric, the President is reportedly haunted by the “Jimmy Carter Disaster” of 1980. Trump recently noted that Carter “had no chance” after the botched Desert One rescue mission. This historical awareness suggests that while “boots on the ground” are unlikely, a “shoot to cause panic” strategy—as suggested by Chatham House associates—may be the preferred middle ground.
The risk remains high. While proxies like Hezbollah and the Assad regime are weakened, Iran still maintains a significant ballistic missile arsenal. Furthermore, military analysts warn that a symbolic strike could inadvertently cause a “rally around the flag” effect, hardening domestic support for the clerical establishment rather than toppling it.